This is not an official site of the HOA, but the original home of the 2022 Board of Directors. This information is captured for member information and dispute resolution purposes (such as ADRE).
Please Ask Yourself:
Why are homeowners requesting records from the HOA?
Perhaps it's because what they are being told doesn't seem to align with what they have observed or experienced. Requesting records is a legitimate way for members to verify information, understand how decisions are being made, and ensure that the association is operating transparently.
The homeowners asking these questions may ultimately be protecting the interests, rights, and assets of every member of the community, including yours.
Instead of attacking those who ask questions or exercise their statutory rights, consider directing those questions to the Board. Transparency should welcome inquiry, not discourage it. PLEASE SEE NEW POSTS AT: 2026 Board Meetings
The question in the infographic below should guide you in understanding where we are coming from. Every board since our inception and every other HOA run by a competent board would have all of these answers on the record. Does our current board have the answers? Don't trust us... Ask.
What if you are trusting the wrong people?
In 2022, the same people and their associates cheered to get your voting record.
The HOA attorneys analyzed the situation and advised us that we had to provide access. Furthermore, we were told it was illegal and that it would expose the HOA to a lawsuit if we didn't comply with the law.
One member was, begrudgingly, given access to the records.
The laws have not changed.
Please feel free to do your own homework. Here are the relevant statutes:
A.R.S. § 33-1812 (https://azleg.gov/ars/33/01812.htm) – Election records
& A.R.S. § 33-1805 (https://azleg.gov/ars/33/01805.htm)– Association records)
The board couldn't care less about statutes and corporate governance.
Jul 15, 2026
I am writing because I continue to observe a growing pattern of governance issues that concern not only me but many other homeowners as well. Rather than improving, these issues appear to be increasing in both frequency and significance. They warrant your immediate attention.
Financial Oversight
The Association is authorizing significant expenditures without sufficient transparency or meaningful oversight. During the past year, approximately $400,000 was reportedly spent without formal board action taken during an open board meeting. In addition, landscaping work appears to be authorized on an ongoing basis without clearly defined project scopes, competitive bidding by project segment, or publicly documented board approval.
Similarly, some reserve funds have reportedly been placed in a checking account rather than in investment vehicles typically used for such funds. If there is a legitimate financial or operational reason for this decision, homeowners deserve an explanation.
Election and Other Records
I do not understand why the Association's current position regarding inspection of election records differs from the legal guidance previously provided.
During the 2022 Board's term, Chad advised that Arizona law requires election records to be made available for homeowner inspection. That failure to do so could expose the Association to unnecessary legal risk. Consistent with that advice, the Association made election records available to a member.
It is difficult to reconcile that earlier interpretation of the law with the Association's current position. Arizona statutes governing member inspection rights have not changed.
We already know that Associa and the Board violated Peter's rights to access the 2024 Tax Return since December 11, 2025. Both playing shameful games and telling him that the record was not available. (SEE POST BELOW⬇️. As you can see below, the board and Associa have had the tax return since November 3, 2025. The president signed the return on November 17, 2025, which is the date reflected on the IRS filed return.)
If the Association believes its legal position has changed, I respectfully request the legal basis supporting that conclusion.
Transparency and Open Meetings
The Board's actions continue to raise concerns regarding transparency.
Many motions are not clearly articulated before being voted upon, making it difficult to determine precisely what actions have been authorized. For this reason, anyone can manipulate the record to reflect what they want versus what was discussed at the meeting. Meeting agendas lack sufficient detail for homeowners to understand what substantive business will be discussed.
There is also very little meaningful discussion during open meetings, creating the appearance that significant deliberation has already occurred before the meeting begins. Arizona's open meeting requirements exist so homeowners can observe the Board's deliberative process, not merely witness formal votes.
Meeting Notices
Meeting notice practices also appear problematic.
The Association has largely limited meeting notices to TownSq. However, a substantial percentage of homeowners either are not registered on TownSq or have disabled notifications due to the volume of unrelated postings. Traditional notification methods, including roadside signs, newsletters, and email announcements, have disappeared.
As a result, most homeowners are not receiving notices and agendas of board meetings. I question whether the Association's current notice practices satisfy both the spirit and the requirements of Arizona law.
Homeowner Participation
Homeowners should be permitted to address the Board without unnecessary interruption or disparate treatment. The recurring interruptions experienced by several homeowners discourage meaningful participation and diminish confidence in the Board's commitment to open governance.
Management's Role
One of the primary responsibilities of professional management is to help ensure that the Association operates in compliance with Arizona statutes, its governing documents, and recognized governance best practices.
Based on what I have observed over the past several years, I do not believe that objective is being achieved.
I have attempted to address these issues informally, privately, and patiently over the last four years by requesting information and encouraging greater transparency. Unfortunately, the problems continue to escalate rather than improve.
Accordingly, I request that Associa and Association counsel review these matters, advise the Board regarding its statutory obligations, and take appropriate steps to restore transparency, accountability, and homeowner confidence.
These concerns are significant and will not simply disappear if left unaddressed.
My request is simple. Please help the Board understand and fulfill its obligations under Arizona law, the governing documents, and accepted nonprofit governance practices. Your role as Association counsel is not only to advise the Board but also to help protect the Association from unnecessary legal exposure by encouraging transparency, statutory compliance, and sound governance.
That outcome benefits every homeowner, the Board, and the Association itself.
If you believe that the members presenting opposing or alternative opinions are attacking the board, review the meeting recordings. (Those on TownSq or this site have access to all of them.)
Have you reviewed the videos, or just trust the board members and their supporters' word?
If you haven't, please review them and share with us what we did wrong.
As you review the documents available to you/member of the HOA on TownSq, know that numerous documents have been shared with you through Peter's quiet, private requests. Things that should be shared with us in a timely manner require significant effort on the part of others. In this case, Peter is doing this while he is being shamelessly vilified. What else is new...
Here's where these documents can be found:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Financial Audits
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Agendas
Etc.
If you don't believe that this is a true statement. Peter can share copies of his TownSq requests.
If you believe that the financials presented on this site are not correct or cannot be trusted, then let us know where we went wrong. (Those on TownSq can easily double-check our calculations.)
Please don't attack us, but rather show us where we went wrong. We are willing to listen
The typical MO from those who are hiding things is to make confusing statements and accusations for sympathy pains and support. Don't become a victim of their methods of misdirection and misinformation.
Finally, if you believe that we are finding pleasure in attacking others, ask yourselves this:
How many posts have you seen from us on:
NextDoor
Media
How many times have you heard us calling board members Nazies, Hitler, dictators, fascists, or the like?
The answer is not. Let's now flip it to some of the board members and their supporters.
Question: Can you afford a $1,000 bill?
Our board of three years is doing that as you're reading this website. Wake up because the bills are starting to print. (Yes, we are talking about a special assessment.)
The above figures need to be updated with the actual results for 2024 ($68,187 vs $85,000) and 2025 (TBD upon filing the tax return). Unfortunately, both are now forecasted to underperform.
Results We Are Proud of... Financial Performance, Transparency, Long-Term Planning.
As can be seen... There's more to running a community than landscaping.
Being good stewards of our CC&Rs, bylaws, financial wellness, and other land management issues. Not selective enforcement... And certainly not just landscaping.
These are only a few points for you to reflect on:
Contracts with landscapers were not approved until May 21, 2026
August 7, 2024 - at $42 per hour with no scope of work (Landscaping Company Incorporated on July 11, 2024 - Why was this company placed under contract only 30 days after they were incorporated?)
January 2025 - at $45 per hour with no scope of work
January 2026 - at $47.50 per hour with no scope of work
2. Another $150,000 for Erosion Mitigation
3. $4,532 Additional Expenses for Bollards
3. Major Open Meeting Statute Violation for 2025
Total Operating Expenses: $574,689.56
Total Spending approved during open HOA meetings: $175,154.74
Minimum Expenses Not Approved in open HOA meetings: ($399,535.80)
2025 Shortfall to Reserves Budget is:
($533,595) likely worse (estimated only due to not having an actual interest earned on investments for 2025).
Reserve funds decreased by $320,795. Forecasted interest income $85.000. Budgeted reserve contribution $127,800. Adding all three gives us a total shortfall of $533,595. However, the landscaping is great!
This translates to a $557 shortfall per home. A special assessment is coming.
Lower yielding Mutual Funds are being used instead of CDs.
$192,514.94 over the landscaping budget in 2024. However, erosion hasn't changed.
The highest cost to ECR - Landscaping contract with Ramos Landscaping was NOT VOTED on in an open meeting in 2024 nor in 2025. Furthermore, the Scope of Work Statements lack credible detail. Contains NO PLAN for $42/hour/person.
Spotty Financial Reporting Since August 31, 2025. December 2025 Financials were published on March 16, 2026.
$130,000 was transferred from reserve funds to operating. With no use of funds described.
$150,000 is owed to the reserve funds.
General ledger account 1403 shows $416,880 in Construction Defect Funds. This should be no more than $110K.
Spent $20K on new monuments after spending nearly another $20K for the existing monument.
Spent $27K for sidewalk grinding.
Spent $28K on welding and painting of railings.
⏯️Please take a look at the rest of this website for details on why we are concerned with the health of our HOA.
2025 Board Results & 2026 Board Results
⏸️Board Meeting Minutes and Videos Can Be Found Here:
2026 Board Meetings 👈💡Don't care for our opinion, listen to their own words.
Revised 2024 with Actual Interest and Tax Savings. (7/2/2026 using our tax return)
Investment performance should be tracking between 4 and 5%. Plus, we have more money invested but generating fewer interest dollars.
We have more money invested but generating fewer interest dollars.
2024 & 2025 & 2026 Board Issuing No-Bid Contracts to Landscapers for Erosion Mitigation and Landscaping Projects - Billed per person per hour (No plan, No terms, No project scope, No transparency...
Developed the scope of work document to set the contract expectations
What are your thoughts about the Scope of Work and an hourly contract?
Contracts with landscapers were not approved until May 21, 2026
August 7, 2024 - at $42 per hour with no scope of work (Landscaping Company Incorporated on July 11, 2024 - Why was this company placed under contract only 30 days after they were incorporated?)
January 2025 - at $45 per hour with no scope of work
January 2026 - at $47.50 per hour with no scope of work
Additional person was added to the landscaping crew at $47.50 per hour with no board approval (over $10K per year)
🛑DID YOU KNOW?🛑
This monstrosity has a price tag of $25,000, NO PLAN, and with NO member input.
The $25K plan finally arrives on TownSq on April 29th after the money has been spent, and the county has declined the project. Now the board is pleading with the county to let us put these monstrosities in the two detention ponds.
We already have a monument... We didn't need to waste all of this money. However, given that they spent this money outside a board meeting, the board members may be personally liable for those sums.
More waste... Did you vote for these?
More reasons why your assessment is about to increase.
It was discovered that the board had already begun working on erosion mitigation projects with the landscapers without informing the community of the plan and its associated costs.
Furthermore, the board is instructing the engineering company on what it wants to do and soliciting the engineering firm's opinion. It should be the other way around. Otherwise, why did we hire them?
Here are some of the most important spots from the meeting recording:
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=109 - The engineer discusses how he didn't do any work with boards prior to 2025. Indeed, previous boards were useless. 😵💫
Problem - The engineer was instructed not to prioritize areas but rather to treat everything as a one-year priority. This is not wise.
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=1194 - We asked John for his opinion on what we have done. Started working in January 2025 and asked John to visit on March 11, 2025. "Does this look like what you expect? Not to put words in your mouth..."
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=1478 - We need more permanent solutions to the things we are doing to redirect the water to the end of the channels. (Sound familiar?) Important. Lots of misleading statements.
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=2127 - Who will you use to do the erosion mitigation work, and are they qualified? They are using the same group for doing minor work. 😵💫
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=2292 - Who is liable for the work that is being conducted for any errors made? Non-answer. "I'm not going to be liable for providing suggestions." Therefore, his nod means nothing. (VERY IMPORTANT!!!)
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=2593 - So who is qualified to do the work? Cleaning channels no. When building channels, you need to have knowledge. (VERY IMPORTANT!!!)
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=2999 - If you change water flow, you should communicate with the county. Are you? Interesting response...
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=3083 - The original design explained... Really good education.
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=3202 - About changing the flow of the water - This makes no sense... The engineer already described this. This comment creates confusion and misinformation.
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=3255 - If the wattles had been maintained, would things be different? [This is where successive boards should have done better.]
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=3314 - I didn't get an answer on liability. Plus, you are currently installing new channels in locations different from where the original natural swale was. You are disrupting the natural flow... Important comment on liability. Need to find the original plan.
https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=3502 - Consideration to slow the water flow out of the upper basins. [The answer is not accurate... The engineer had discussed during a tour with the committee in December 2021 (those present can validate, as all basins were assessed) and later in 2022. However, this was not addressed in the assessment nor mitigation strategies.]
This board is out of control and needs to be removed.
2025 Shortfall (loss) to Reserves Budget is: ($533,595)
*$47,000 Spent on Adding Plants to the Boulevard - Open Meeting Statute Violation
*$399,536 Spent Without Board Approval - Open Meeting Statute Violation
2026 Board Approved on April 16, 2026
*$392,152 Seal Coat Project - *$10,500 Seeding Park
2026 Board Approved on May 21, 2026
*Another $150,000 for Erosion Mitigation - *$4,532 Additional Expenses for Bollards
*$42 on August 7, 2024, $47 in 25, and $48.50 in 26 Per Hour Rate of Landscapers not approved in Open Meeting Sessions Until May 21, 2026, Another item missed that an additional person was added to the crew (translated to over $10K increase in costs.)
Less Than 2 Years - $1.4 MILLION Wasted
Get Involved and Do Your Homework
This is a private website... Not the official site of the Eagle Crest Ranch HOA